Training Program
Are the objectives, design and direction of the proposed research training program
appropriate? Does the proposed program provide suitable training for the levels of
trainees being proposed and the area of science to be supported by the program? Is
the quality of proposed course contents and training experience appropriate for all
levels of trainees to be included in the program? Are inter- and multi-disciplinary
research training opportunities or novel concepts, approaches, methodologies, or technologies
appropriately utilized?
Training Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI)
Does the Training PD/PI have the scientific background, expertise, and experience
appropriate to direct, manage, coordinate, and administer the proposed research training
program? Does the PD/PI plan to commit adequate
time to the program? For applications designating multiple PD/PIs, is the leadership
approach, including the designated roles and responsibilities, governance and organizational
structure consistent with and justified by the aims of the research training program
and the expertise of each of the PD/PIs? Does the PD/PI team bring complementary and
integrated expertise to the proposed research training program? Does the leadership
plan describe how multiple PD/PIs will benefit the program and the trainees?
Preceptors/Mentors
Is the caliber of preceptors/mentors as researchers, including successful competition
for research support in areas directly related to the proposed research training program
appropriate for their role in the training program? Is there a sufficient number of
experienced mentors with appropriate expertise and funding available at the applicant
institution to support the number of trainees and levels of trainees being proposed
in the application?
Past Training Record
Is the past research training record of the program, the Training PD/PI, and designated
preceptors/mentors appropriate? How successful are former trainees in seeking further
career development and in establishing productive scientific careers? Is there evidence
of successful completion of programs, receipt of subsequent fellowships and/or career
awards, further training appointments, and similar accomplishments? Is there evidence
of a productive scientific career, such as a record of successful competition for
research grants, receipt of special honors or award, a record of publications, receipt
of patents, promotion to scientific positions, and any other measure of success consistent
with the nature and duration of the training received. What is the track record of
proposed mentors in similar research training programs? Is there a record in retaining
healthprofessional postdoctorates (i.e., individuals with the M.D., D.O, D.D.S. D.N.Sc.,
etc.) for at least 2 years in research training or other research activities, if appropriate?
Institutional Training Environment, Commitment, and Resources
Is the quality of the research environment for the proposed research training program
appropriate? Is the level of institutional commitment, quality of available facilities,
courses, research and research training support suitable? Is the proposed program
to be an integral component of the applicant institution's overall research program/mission?
Trainee Recruitment, Selection, and Retention Plan
Are the quality of the applicant pool and plans for the selection and retention of
individuals appointed to the training program appropriate? Specifically, what is the
size and quality of the applicant pool? Are the recruiting procedures, trainee selection
criteria, and retention strategies appropriate and well defined? Are there advertising
plans or other effective strategies to recruit high-quality trainees?